Will South, Jr. v. Saab Cars Usa, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOETTEL, District Judge:
Defendant-appellant Saab Cars USA, Inc. (“Saab”) appeals from an order entered in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Nevas, J.) denying Saab’s motion to dismiss plaintiff-appellee’s Title VII complaint for failure to file within the statutory time period. For the reasons that follow, the order of the District Court is reversed.
FACTS
Plaintiff-appellee Will South was employed as a Field Support Manager for defendant-appellant Saab in Connecticut. On July 14, 1990, Saab terminated South, allegedly due to a company-wide reduction in force,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Baldwin County Welcome Center v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Phyllis Miller v. Maxwell's International Inc., Dba Maxwell's Plum, Debtor in Possession Carlo Galazzo, Gen. Mgt., Dino La Rosa Don Bohn Don SchupakCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- KAREN VAN ZANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES; And Kenneth Hasan King, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Teresa Zerilli-Edelglass v. New York City Transit Authority and Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Cheryl Chapman v. Choicecare Long Island Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- A.Q.C. Ex Rel. Castillo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- Nicanor A. BRIONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marvin T. RUNYON, Jr., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.