Legal Opinion

Beekman v. Ross

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 1, 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The order appealed from should be reversed and the determination of the commission reinstated (see Matter of Mouakad v. Ross, 274 App. Div. 74). We think it is implicit in the determination that the cross application for a decrease of rent based on a diminution of services was considered and passed upon by the commission. In fixing the value of property for the purpose of determining whether the landlord was receiving a reasonable return, the assessed valuation, particularly where there has been an adjudication thereof, may be treated as presumptive evidence. Of course, that presumption is…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mouakad v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bankers Trust Co. v. BacotSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  2. Matter of Estate of CarterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  3. Granville v. RossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  4. Monk v. FinkelsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Monk v. FinkelsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API