Legal Opinion
Michael J. Zigmond, Movant v. Selective Service Local Board No. 16, Movees
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 17, 1968No. 262_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Chief Judge.
Petitioner asks us to enjoin, pending appeal, an order for induction into the United States Army. He is 26 years old and is, concededly, properly classified 1-A by his local Selective Service Board, defendants herein. Until recently he has been deferred as a student. Because he is 26 he has since been, until the events in question, in a 1-A group which is not subject to induction until those under 26 and over 19 in his local area have been called. This is pursuant to Selective Service Regulations, and is not, as in a case upon which petitioner relies, a statutory…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Greenwood v. PeacockSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- David Paul O'Brien v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
- Kimball v. SELECTIVE SERVICE LOCAL BD. NO. 15, NEW YORK, NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Peoria Tribe of Indians v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Zigmond v. Selective Service Local Board 16District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1968
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- The Reverend Henry Hale Bucher, Jr. v. Selective Service System, Local Boards Nos. 2, Etc. And Colonel Joseph Avella, EtcCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Marc Belding Anderson v. General Lewis B. Hershey, National Director, Selective Service SystemCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. BraniganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- United States v. Lawrence DemangoneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Kraus v. Selective Service System Local 25Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.