Legal Opinion
People v. Gandy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 22, 2006PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from an order of the Erie County Court (Timothy J. *1164Drury, J.), entered March 9, 2005. The order determined that defendant is a level three risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act.
It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he is a level three risk under the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). County Court’s upward departure from the presumptive risk level in determining that defendant is a level three risk rather than a level two…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. HeichelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. CarswellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. HittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. McCollumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. HoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. WheelerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. MayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. PerrahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.