Miller v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SALARIO, Judge.
Wilfred Paul Miller filed a motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) alleging that four of his six sentences arising from various child sexual offenses were illegal because they exceeded the applicable statutory maximum sentences for those offenses. The postconviction court denied the motion reasoning that Miller’s sentences were legal because they were the lowest permissible sentences under the criminal punishment code. See § 921.002, Fla. Stat. (2014). That decision was mistaken because Miller’s offenses predate the criminal punishment code, and as a result,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Poore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Brooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
- Mays v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Savage v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
- Patterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016