Legal Opinion · Dissent

American Insurance v. Black

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 10, 1933No. 22101Published

1DissentBroyles, C. J.

In my opinion, where a loss, covered by a policy of fire insurance, has occurred, the interest of the insured is not subject to garnishment by a creditor of the insured at a time when proofs of loss have not been made as required by the provisions of the policy, and when there has been no waiver by the insurance company of its right to insist upon such provisions, and when there has been no absolute refusal by the company to pay. See, in this connection, Civil Code (1910), §§ 5271, 5272; Bates v. Forsyth, 69 Ga. 365 (1-b); Tim v. Franklin, 87 Ga. 93 (13 S. E. 259); Singer S. M. Co. v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Southern Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  2. Bates & Co. v. ForsythSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
  3. Tim & Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1891
  4. McKay v. Rowland & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  5. Callaway v. Globe & Rutgers Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API