Legal Opinion

Golasa v. Struse

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided December 4, 1978No. 4092Published

1Opinion of the Court

KALISH, J.,

Plaintiff Carl Golasa (hereinafter referred to as Golasa) brought this action against defendants Aztec Wire & Cable, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Aztec), Edward G. Struse (hereinafter referred to as Struse), and Jay Lewis Powell (hereinafter referred to as Powell), both shareholders and officers of Aztec, in an attempt to be restored to his positions as shareholder, director and president of Aztec. Defendants were enjoined from acting against plaintiff until the case was decided on its merits when Judge Gelfand granted plaintiffs request for a preliminary injunction on August…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. HORNSBY v. LOHMEYERSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Elliott v. LindquistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Hall v. West Chester Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Grafton v. MastellerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API