Legal Opinion
Bielawski v. American Export Lines
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided July 29, 1963No. Civ. A. 3641PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALTER E. HOFFMAN, Chief Judge.
The remaining issue for determination in this case is the perplexing problem of attorney’s fees, expenses, etc., incurred by the defendant, American Export Lines, now sought to be recovered from Norfolk Shipbuilding & Dry dock Corporation under the rapidly expanding theory of indemnification.
This action was instituted by an employee of Norfolk Shipbuilding & Dry-dock Corporation, hereinafter referred to as the shipyard, against American Export Lines, the owner pro hac vice of the vessel known as the SS EXMOUTH, to recover for his serious personal injuries,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- West v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Antonio Paliaga v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, and Third-Party v. Turner & Blanchard, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Roper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- General Electric Company, and Third-Party v. Kelly C. Moretz, and Mason & Dixon Lines, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nicola Massa v. C. A. Venezuelan Navigacion, and Third-Party v.john W. McGrath Corporation, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- General Electric Company and Electric Mutual Liability Insurance Company v. Cuban American Nickel CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Singer v. DorrDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Barge UM-23BDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1968
- Crosson v. N. V. Stoomvaart MIJ NederlandDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.