Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bill Kasper Construction Co. v. Morrison

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 8, 2012No. 5D12-672Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partOrfinger, C.J.

Certiorari relief is appropriate where the lower court takes an action that departs from the essential requirements of law, which, if left unremedied, will cause material injury to the petitioner throughout the remainder of the proceedings below and an appellate remedy would be inadequate. Brooks v. Owens, 97 So.2d 693, 695 (Fla.1957); Travelers Indem. Co. v. Hill, 388 So.2d 648, 649 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980).

In the overwhelming majority of cases, I agree that the erroneous denial of a discovery motion or the striking of a witness is generally correctable upon review of the final judgment. However,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brooks v. OwensSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Travelers Indemnity Company v. HillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Sabol v. BennettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. Baldwin v. Shands Teaching Hospital & Clinics, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  5. Nucci v. SimmonsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API