Legal Opinion
IN RE PLUM BABY FOOD LITIGATION
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 28, 2024No. 4:21-cv-00913Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 IN RE PLUM BABY FOOD LITIGATION CASE NO. 4:21-CV-00913-YGR 7 This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY 8 JUDGMENT 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 210, 233, 245 10 11 12 13 Nine plaintiffs, namely Sarah Brown, Josh Crawford, Jessica David, Autumn Ellison, 14 Ludmila Gulkarov, Vanessa Mathiesen, Kelly McKeon, Tommy Nurre, and Janine Torrence, sue 15 defendant Plum, PBC on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of baby food products sold under 16 the “Plum Organics” brand.1 Plaintiffs allege that they were…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Guggenheimer v. GinzburgNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Oswego Laborers' Local 214 Pension Fund v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Williams v. Gerber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Daugherty v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.