Atlantic Ice & Coal Co. v. Harris
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
1. While tlie doctrine of the so-called “turntable cases” has not been limited strictly to turntable cases alone, both the Supreme Court and this court have refused to extend it to eases which upon their facts do not come “strictly and fully” within the principle upon which those cases rest. Savannah, Florida & Western Ry. Co. v. Beavers, 113 Ga. 398 (39 S. E. 82) (54 L. R. A. 314) ; Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. Pierce, 145 Ga. 130, 132 (88 S. E. 72) ; Manos v. Myers-Miller Furniture Co., 32 Ga. App. 644 (124 S. E. 357) ; Haley Motor Co. v. Boynton, 40 Ga. App. 675 (150 S. E. 862). As was said…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mandeville Mills v. DaleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Rollestone v. Cassirer & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Savannah, Florida & Western Railway Co. v. BeaversSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Petree v. Davison-Paxon-Stokes Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Greeson v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bicandi v. Boise Payette Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Murray Biscuit Co. v. HuttoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Brown v. BoneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Starland Dairies, Inc. v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Hornsby v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.