Legal Opinion

In re Arturo G.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided December 12, 2017No. Docket: Yor-17-280Published

1Opinion of the CourtSaufley, C.J.

[¶ 1] The parents of Arturo G. appeal from a judgment of the District Court (Biddeford, Foster, J.) terminating. their parental rights to Arturo pursuant to 22 M.R.S. § 4055(l)(A)(l)(a) and (B)(2)(a), (b)(i), (ii) (2016) and, with respect to the father, § 4055(l)(B)(2)(b)(iv). Arturo is two and a half years old and, as a result of his parents’ drug addictions, has lived with four different care providers in his short life. The father challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the, court’s finding of unfitness. He also argues that he was deprived of due process when the court denied…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. MezzanattoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. State v. DolloffSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  3. In re A.M.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  4. In re Caleb M.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  5. In re Logan M.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API