Legal Opinion

Kramm v. Mid-Century Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 1, 1998No. 96C873016; CA A98404PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Defendant Mid-Century Insurance Company appeals from a judgment in a district court action, awarding the plaintiff damages for unpaid personal injury protection (PIP) benefits as well as attorney fees. Defendant asserts that the court erred in denying its motion to dismiss pursuant to ORS 742.520(6) (1995) and in denying its motion to strike plaintiffs allegations of an entitlement to attorney fees under ORS 742.061. We affirm.

Defendant insured plaintiff under an automobile liability policy that provided statutorily prescribed PIP benefits. In February 1995, plaintiff was involved in an auto…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Douglass v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Foltz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grisby v. Progressive Preferred InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. Grisby v. Progressive Preferred InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API