Whitsel v. Hoover
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Chief Justice.
The appellants, George L. Whitsel and eighteen others — non-residents of Texas— the collateral heirs of W. I. Whitsel, deceased, instituted this action in trespass to try title to recover an undivided forty-eight one hundredths interest in certain lands from the appellees, H. E. Hoover, J. W. Sanders, A. V. McQuiddy and G. L. Addison, and to cancel and annul a deed by which the appellants had theretofore conveyed to appellees the interest in the land which they sought to- recover.
The appellants alleged that as to them the appellees were acting in a fiduciary capacity…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Farrar v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Erskine v. De la BaumTexas Supreme Court · 1848
- Cole v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
- O'Brien v. Von LienenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
3Cited by18 opinions
- Blanton v. Sherman Compress Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
- ML Mayfield Petroleum Corporation v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Bifano v. Econo Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Fossier v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Frankfurt v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.