Legal Opinion

Whitsel v. Hoover

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 3, 1938No. 4932PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Chief Justice.

The appellants, George L. Whitsel and eighteen others — non-residents of Texas— the collateral heirs of W. I. Whitsel, deceased, instituted this action in trespass to try title to recover an undivided forty-eight one hundredths interest in certain lands from the appellees, H. E. Hoover, J. W. Sanders, A. V. McQuiddy and G. L. Addison, and to cancel and annul a deed by which the appellants had theretofore conveyed to appellees the interest in the land which they sought to- recover.

The appellants alleged that as to them the appellees were acting in a fiduciary capacity…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farrar v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Erskine v. De la BaumTexas Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Cole v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  4. O'Brien v. Von LienenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Blanton v. Sherman Compress Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  2. ML Mayfield Petroleum Corporation v. KellyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Bifano v. Econo Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Fossier v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  5. Frankfurt v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API