Legal Opinion
Fort Berthold Land & Livestock Ass'n v. Anderson
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided March 22, 2005No. A4-04-109PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
HOVLAND, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment filed on November 22, 2004, and the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss filed on December 12, 2004. The Plaintiffs oppose the motion. For the following reasons, the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is granted and the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment is denied.
I. BACKGROUND
The named plaintiffs are enrolled members of the Three Affiliated Tribes and are ranchers on the Fort Berthold Reservation in North Dakota. The…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crow Creek Sioux Tribe v. Bureau of Indian AffairsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2006
- FORT BERTHOLD LAND AND LIVESTOCK v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2005
- Delorme-Gaines v. SweeneyDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2021