Legal Opinion

Panzer v. Panzer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1948PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Action for a partnership dissolution and accounting, etc., wherein one of the defendants sets forth a counterclaim against the plaintiff to recover for the sale of stock. Order dismissing the counterclaim, without prejudice to the bringing of a separate action for the cause set forth therein, and the judgment entered on the order, reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the motion to dismiss the counterclaim denied, without costs. Plaintiff’s time within which to reply to the counterclaim is extended until ten days after the entry of an order hereon. (See Panzer v. Panzer, ante,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ippisch v. Moricz-SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Cecil v. CecilNew York Supreme Court · 1950
  3. National Fittings Co. of New York, Inc. v. Durst Manufacturing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API