Legal Opinion

Rizzo v. Long Island Rail Road

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 27, 1961Published

1Opinion of the Court

The examination shall proceed on 20 days’ written notice or on any other date mutually fixed by the parties. The rules and regulations would not be admissible in evidence (Longacre v. Yonkers R. R. Co., 236 N. Y. 119, 125; Abady v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 6 A D 2d 803; Renoud v. City of New York, 251 App. Div. 851, 251 App. Div. 868), Accordingly, their production at the examination should not have been ordered (Bergstrom v. Ridgway Co., 138 App. Div. 178). The fact that plaintiff in his complaint has alleged the existence of the rules and regulations as well as the substance of some of them,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Longacre v. . Yonkers Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Lattimer v. Sun-Herald Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Bergstrom v. Ridgway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  4. Renoud v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  5. Renoud v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API