Legal Opinion

Buchanan v. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided October 9, 1953No. Civ. A. 745PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLRED, District Judge.

By fourth amended complaint plaintiffs, seek (1) damages of $146,000 from Sinclair; (-2) an accounting by Sinclair for royalty payments; and (3) declaratory judgment that lease No. '377 has terminated under its own terms and removing-cloud from plaintiffs’ title. Sinclair does, not dispute plaintiffs’ right to an accounting; but Has'moved for summary judgment as to damages and the declaratory relief sought. Plaintiffs have filed a counter motion for judgment (except as to the amount of damagés). ■ The motions are based on the pleadings and affidavits.

The Claim for…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Veal v. ThomasonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Binford v. SnyderTexas Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Southland Royalty Co. v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Denman v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Sharpe v. Landowners Oil Assn.Texas Supreme Court · 1936

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. A. F. Buchanan and Wife, Celeste Buchanan v. Sinclair Oil & Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
  2. Koch-Ellis Marine Contractors, Inc., Individually and as of the Barge Ke-14 v. Phillips Petroleum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API