Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Mulry

The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

Decided December 29, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by James Gordon Bennett against Lawrence Y. Mulry and Henry W. Pflanz, as sureties on a bond given in an attachment suit by plaintiff against James Gordon Bennett. A verdict was ordered for plaintiff, subject to the opinion of the court at general term. Judgment for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

An action having been commenced, izi this court, in August, 1890, by the plaintiff herein against Clark Balcom, an attachment issued against the property of said Balcom. In September, 1890, the defendants herein executed an u-ndertak*791ing whereby they jointly and severally undertook that the said Balcom would, on demand, pay plaintiff the amount of any judgment which might be recovered in said action against him, not exceeding $350 and interest. This action is to recover upon that undertaking. In addition to the foregoing facts, the complaint herein alleges that said Balcom applied to discharge…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griffin v. . Long Island Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Linton v. Unexcelled Fireworks Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Hill v. . BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Coleman v. BeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1866
  5. Jewett v. CraneNew York Supreme Court · 1861

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Braithwaite v. JordanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API