Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. King Tung Kong
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 27, 2012PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Pineda-Kirwan, J.), dated September 7, 2011, which granted the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff pedestrian was crossing a street when he was *822struck by a vehicle owned and operated by the defendant. The plaintiff established, prima facie, his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability by presenting proof that he was walking within a crosswalk and that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Rosenblatt v. VenizelosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Platt v. WolmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Sulaiman v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by11 opinions
- Buchinger v. Jazz Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Garcia v. Lenox Hill Florist III, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Brown v. PinkettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Castiglione v. KruseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Pieper v. HusseinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.