Legal Opinion

Goldstein Bros. v. Brown

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 3, 1921No. 12394PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Claim; from city court of LaGrauge — Judge Duke Davis. March 8, 1921.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

Goldstein Brothers obtained a judgment against Brown and bad summons of garnishment issued thereon and served on the La-Grange Banking and Trust Company. The garnishee answered that it held a certain sum due the defendant. There was no traverse to the answer. A claim to the fund was filed, and, when the claim case was called, neither the plaintiffs nor their counsel were present; the claimant introduced evidence, and took a verdict finding the property “ not subject.” Held-.

1. This was unauthorized by law. When a claim is filed and at the hearing neither the plaintiff nor counsel representing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Booth v. Brooke & Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Davis v. Pringle Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Bell & Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hamilton v. HardwickCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API