Sak v. State

Hall, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for conspiracy to commit murder. The sole issue on this appeal is whether all the elements of the crime of conspiracy were proved by the state; specifically whether "an overt act to effect the object of the conspiracy” had occurred before defendant "withdrew his agreement to commit a crime.” Code Ann. §§ 26-3201 and 26-3202.

The evidence supports the verdict. There was substantial testimony, including a legally acquired admission by the defendant, that he drove from Macon to LaFollette, Tennessee with a pistol and with the intention…