Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Meyerson v. Werner

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 14, 1982No. Nos. 1351, 1361, Dockets 82-7261, 82-7351Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGeorge C. Pratt, Circuit Judge

While I agree with all other parts of the majority’s decision, I am unable to accept their view that the conveyance of Whispering Pines should be considered a deed and not a mortgage. In working out the settlement agreement before the magistrate, the parties attempted to do precisely what New York law forbids: to make a deed out of this conveyance which was “intended only as a security in the nature of a mortgage.”

New York’s Real Property Law § 320 provides in relevant part:

A deed conveying real property, which, by any other written instrument, appears to be intended only as a security in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Peugh v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Mooney v. . ByrneNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. MacAuley v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Hughes v. . HarlamNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. Walter E. Heller & Co. v. American Flyers Airline Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API