Meyerson v. Werner
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGeorge C. Pratt, Circuit Judge
While I agree with all other parts of the majority’s decision, I am unable to accept their view that the conveyance of Whispering Pines should be considered a deed and not a mortgage. In working out the settlement agreement before the magistrate, the parties attempted to do precisely what New York law forbids: to make a deed out of this conveyance which was “intended only as a security in the nature of a mortgage.”
New York’s Real Property Law § 320 provides in relevant part:
A deed conveying real property, which, by any other written instrument, appears to be intended only as a security in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Peugh v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Mooney v. . ByrneNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- MacAuley v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Hughes v. . HarlamNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Walter E. Heller & Co. v. American Flyers Airline Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.