Legal Opinion
Winter v. Doane
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 29, 1982No. 43824PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The District Court’s finding of the defendant Doane to be in contempt and its dismissal of his cross-petition as a sanction for failing to answer a deposition question ordered answered by the court was correct and is affirmed. See Campbell v. Lutz, 182 Neb. 27, 152 N.W.2d 101 (1967).
Affirmed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Campbell v. LutzNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
3Cited by2 opinions
- Tyler v. HeywoodNebraska Court of Appeals · 1999
- Tyler v. HeywoodNebraska Court of Appeals · 1999