Legal Opinion

Winter v. Doane

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1982No. 43824PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The District Court’s finding of the defendant Doane to be in contempt and its dismissal of his cross-petition as a sanction for failing to answer a deposition question ordered answered by the court was correct and is affirmed. See Campbell v. Lutz, 182 Neb. 27, 152 N.W.2d 101 (1967).

Affirmed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Campbell v. LutzNebraska Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tyler v. HeywoodNebraska Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Tyler v. HeywoodNebraska Court of Appeals · 1999