Legal Opinion

People v. Espinoza

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 30, 2001No. 00PDJ044, 00PDJ051PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER IMPOSING SANCTION

SANCTION IMPOSED: ATTORNEY DISBARRED

A sanctions hearing was held on January 4, 2001, before the Presiding Disciplinary Judge ("PDJ") and two hearing board members, Rebecca Stepien-Moss and Lorraine E. Parker, both members of the bar. James C. Coyle, Assistant Attorney Regulation Counsel, represented the People of the State of Colorado (the "People"). Pamela Michelle Espinoza ("Espinoza"), the respondent, did not appear either in person or by counsel.

The People's exhibits 1-8 were offered and admitted into evidence. The PDJ and Hearing Board considered the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. RichardsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. In Re LopezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. RooseSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. People v. PollSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
  3. People v. VaralloSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API