Legal Opinion

Bonura v. Davidson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 10, 1919No. 7630Published

1Opinion of the Court

CHARLES E. CLAI30R3E, JUDGE.

The only question in this case is whether the broker •who brought about a contract of sale between the plaintiff and the defendant herein is entitled to a commission. The pleadings are a.s follows:

Plaintiff Bonura alleged that in accordance with a Tiritten- document annexed to his petition he agreed to buy from the defendant, Davidson, a certain lot of ground for the price of §2100; that he deposited ten per cent of this price, say.. §210 with If. J, hiesi, the broker who effected the sale; that he, the plaintiff, refused to consummate the sale and to take the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smith v. BonsallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
  2. Wilbor v. M'GillicuddySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
  3. Baldwin's v. CarletonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
  4. Jones v. Lehigh & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  5. City of Rockland v. FarnsworthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API