Bonura v. Davidson
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES E. CLAI30R3E, JUDGE.
The only question in this case is whether the broker •who brought about a contract of sale between the plaintiff and the defendant herein is entitled to a commission. The pleadings are a.s follows:
Plaintiff Bonura alleged that in accordance with a Tiritten- document annexed to his petition he agreed to buy from the defendant, Davidson, a certain lot of ground for the price of §2100; that he deposited ten per cent of this price, say.. §210 with If. J, hiesi, the broker who effected the sale; that he, the plaintiff, refused to consummate the sale and to take the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. BonsallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1835
- Wilbor v. M'GillicuddySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
- Baldwin's v. CarletonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840
- Jones v. Lehigh & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- City of Rockland v. FarnsworthSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.