Legal Opinion

Twineham v. Daniel

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 1, 1996No. A96A1218Published

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

We granted this discretionary appeal to review the trial court’s order granting Gary Daniel’s traverse to the garnishment action filed by his ex-wife, Barbara Twineham, for alleged arrearages in child support payments. In its order, the trial court reduced Daniel’s monthly child support obligation. Twineham appeals, and for reasons which follow, we reverse.

In 1993, Twineham divorced Daniel, and the court awarded custody of the couple’s two daughters to Twineham. The decree required Daniel to pay Twineham $1,300 per month in child support until the children reached 18, married,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brown v. Georgia Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  2. Department of Human Resources v. MortonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API