Legal Opinion

Stonebraker v. Littleton

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 7, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit- Court for Washington County (Hewdebsow and Keedy, JJ.). The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

John W. Stonebraker., of Washington County, owned and operated a paper mill located in that county, and traded under the name of the Antietam Paper Company.

The appellee on this record, William B. Littleton, was at that time in his employ. On the 4th day of March, 1905, Stonebraker, Littleton and certain other persons formed a corporation under the name of the Antietam Paper Company of Washington County, and on the same day this corporation purchased and took over the paper mill and business of Stonebraker.

The record does not show what valuation was placed upon tiie mill and its business; but…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dean v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Wadley, Jones & Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  3. Millett v. HayfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853
  4. Iselin v. SimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parsons v. LipeNew York Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Dempsey v. LangtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API