Legal Opinion
United States v. Shane Floyd
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided September 29, 2017No. 15-4124PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J., joined by Gibbons, J.,
DONALD, J. (pp. 781-90), delivered a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
*764OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
Defendants appeal their criminal convictions arising out of a kickback scheme at a now-defunct community school in Dayton, Ohio. Defendant Shane Floyd was superintendent at the school and defendant Christopher Martin was the chair of the school’s board of directors. Both used their positions to ensure that the school paid over $400,000 in consulting fees to Global Educational Consultants (“Global”), a company owned by defendant Carl Robinson. Robinson, in turn, funneled…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Gray v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Alberto CalderonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- John Harden v. Keith HillmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Demetrius BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Lezmond Mitchell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Trenton R. BirchetteCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.