Legal Opinion

Trevor v. Hawley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Bay. (Cobb, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Plaintiff sued defendants for a bill of merchandise. With the declaration was served an affidavit *505that on October 20, 1892, $219.75 was due, with interest at 6 per cent, from November 29, 1891. A bill of particulars was filed and served, giving items amounting to $219.75. The bill of exceptions states that “no contest was made on any part of plaintiff’s claim, excepting the goods designated as ‘reefers,’ and invoiced at $28.88.” As to these the defendants claimed that the contract gave them the right to return such of them as they could not sell before January 1, 1892, and that they did…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gould v. YoungMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API