Legal Opinion

McKelvey v. North Sterling Irrigating District

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1919No. 9234PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Logan District Court, Hon. H. P. Burke, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This is an action by defendant in error, plaintiff below, to enjoin the defendant from interfering with its appropriated water, escaping by means of seepage from the outlet ditch, from its reservoir, which conveys the water therefrom upon the lands embraced within the irrigation district, and to quiet title to such use of its ■ appropriated' waters.

*12It appears that in the construction of this outlet ditch it was necessary to cross a gulch or draw, which is usually dry, but which extended to the river below. This was done by constructing a fill on the lower side of the ditch, and which caused…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. HagaDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1921
  2. United States v. IdeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921
  3. Fort Morgan Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McCuneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  4. Fort Morgan Reservoir & Irrigation Co. v. McCuneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
  5. Rio Grande Reservoir & Ditch Co. v. Wagon Wheel Gap Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API