Legal Opinion

Corcanges v. Childress

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 22, 1924No. 7161PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

In December, 1915, appellee, Childress, executed and delivered to appellant Corcanges two promissory notes, each for the principal sum of $100. In- the latter part of the year 1917, o-r early in 1918, Corcanges brought suit against Childress to recover the amount of the notes, and Childress contested the suit upon the ground that he was induced to execute and deliver the notes to Corcanges through the latter’s fraud and deceit. Upon a trial on May 10, 1918, Corcanges recovered judgment for the amount of the notes, how ever, and this judgment became final without appeal. Alias execution was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WingfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Thompson v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  3. Gathings v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. U. O. Colson Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Corcanges v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. A. B. Richards Medicine Co. v. DaleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. CL III Funding Holding Company, LLC v. Steelhead Midstream Partners, LLC Strategic Energy Income Fund III, LP Eagleridge Energy II, LLC And Eagleridge Midstream, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API