Legal Opinion
Panama City General Partnership v. Godfrey Panama City Investment, LLC
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 6, 2013No. 1D12-3141PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
Appellant, The Panama City General Partnership (“Partnership”), appeals the trial court’s non-final order denying the *292Partnership’s motion to quash service and set aside a default entered in Appellee’s (“Godfrey”) favor and the denial of its motion for rehearing or reconsideration.
We hold the motion for rehearing or reconsideration is properly considered as a motion for reconsideration, because a motion for rehearing is not authorized on a nonfinal order. And although a motion for reconsideration of a nonfinal order does not toll the 30-day time limit for appeal, the order denying the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Geer v. JacobsenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Telf Corp. v. GomezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Agere Systems Inc. v. All American Crating, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Monte Campbell Crane Co., Inc. v. HancockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Thompson v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Helmich v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Lovelace v. LovelaceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- JAVIER ALONSO-LLAMAZARES, M.D. v. INTERNATIONAL DERMATOLOGY RESEARCH, INC., etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
- Sans Souci Condominium Association, Inc. v. American Coastal Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025
- Steven Wortman v. Christy WortmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.