Legal Opinion

Thomas v. McGrath

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1978PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment of the Appellate Division is reversed substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Morgan's dissenting opinion which is reported at 145 N. J. Super. 288, 296.

Three members of the Court would affirm the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of that Court.

For reversal — Chief Justice Hughes and Justices Sullivan, Schreiber and Handler — 4.

For affirmance — Justices Pashman and Clifford and Judge Conford — 3.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. McGrathNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Division of Elections of State v. JohnstoneAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Winters v. KiffmeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  3. In re RuvoldtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  4. Division of Elections of State v. JohnstoneAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API