Legal Opinion

Holz v. Fishel

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 15, 1888No. 10,114PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from the Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans. Voorhies, J.

1Opinion of the Court

*295Motion to Dismiss.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Pooué, J.

The ground of tiro motion is that tire transcript was filed too late.

The appeal was returnable on the 16th of January last, and the transcript was not filed before the 15th of February following; But appellant relies on an order of tin's Court, rendered on January 20th, extending the return day, thirty days from that date.

Appellee mates the point that the application for delay was itself made too late, and that the order granted thereon was inadvertently and wrongfully issued.

From the minutes, it appears that this Court was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vancampen v. MorrisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1843

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wischer v. Madison Realty CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1961
  2. Hays v. MayerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  3. State Ex Rel. Marcade v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  4. In Re Gem Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  5. Cann v. Ruston State BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API