Legal Opinion

Schuster v. Baumfalk

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1988No. 86-985PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Colwell, D. J.,

Retired.

Defendants appeal a $47,000 jury verdict and judgment against them involving their alleged negligent repair of plaintiffs’ farm equipment (conveyor) while using a brazing torch, causing nearby loose silage and haylage to ignite, smolder, and hours later to burst into flame, damaging plaintiffs’ buildings and equipment. We affirm.

There is little dispute concerning these facts. Norman and Marilyn Schuster, plaintiffs, conduct a farming and livestock-feeding operation on their farm near Pickrell, Gage County, Nebraska. Terry, their son and employee of 10 years, lives on…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rahmig v. Mosley MacHinery Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lincoln Grain, Inc. v. Coopers & LybrandNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Prchal v. PrchalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Lynn v. METROPOLITAN UTILITIES DISTRICTNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. McKinstry v. County of CassNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nichols v. BusseNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Hoeft v. Five Points BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. FIRST NAT. BANK IN MITCHELL v. DaggettNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. McGill Restoration v. Lion Place Condo. Assn.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Production Credit Ass'n v. Eldin Haussermann Farms, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API