Legal Opinion

State v. Jay

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 25, 1881PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Kossuth District Court. The defendant was indicted for the crime of rape. He was convicted of an assault with intent to commit a rape, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Rothrock J.

i. cRiMprAL structious: reasonable doubt. The court instructed the jury that if they found the defendant was not guilty of rape they should then proceed to determine whether he was guilty of an assault with intent to commit a rape, and that if x they found that the defendant was neither guilty of a rape, nor of an assault with intent to commit a rape, they should then proceed to ascertain whether he was guilty of an *165assault and battery, or a single assault. In the 13th instruction given by the court to the jury upon the point as to the reasonable doubt which entitles a party to an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. WaltersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. HathawaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. State v. PostonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. State v. EllingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  4. State v. HeftSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Sterling v. BlackwelderDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API