Legal Opinion
Reno Nat. Bank v. Seaborn
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 17, 1938No. 8805PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of appellee, Receiver of the Winnemucca State Bank and Trust Company, for the amount of the latter’s credit balance in the appellant Reno National Bank, decided by the district court to be money held'in trust for the Winnemucca Bank.
The facts are undisputed. The Winnemucca. Bank had on deposit in the Reno Na*483tional Bank the sum of $2514.82. nemucca Bank failed and one E. J. Seaborn, Bank Examiner of the State of Nevada, became its receiver and succeeded to the legal title to the credit balance in the Reno National Bank. He was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- In re Interborough Consol. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Blakey v. BrinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Jennings v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Kahmann v. MoberlyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. Irving Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Murdoch v. City of Asbury ParkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
- Downriver Community Federal Credit Union v. Penn Square Bank, Through Its Receiver, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Wood Products Credit Union, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Penn Square Bank, Through Its Receiver, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Downriver Community Federal Credit Union v. Penn Square Bank ex rel. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989