Legal Opinion

Kilmer v. Garlick

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1900PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Will county; the Hon. John Small, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Cartwright

On March 28, 1891, the appellee, Louis D. Garlick, recovered a judgment in the county court of Will county against Samuel B. Hughes and Harriet Hughes, his wife. At that time Samuel B. Hughes was the owner of the interests hereinafter stated in lot 2 of Weeks & Munroe’s subdivision of certain premises in Joliet, in said Will county. Lot 2 fronted north on Benton street, and was one hundred and thirty-two feet wide east and west and somewhere about two hundred and ninety-seven feet long north and south, running back to a narrow street called Wenberg street. Samuel B. Hughes was possessed of an…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Loomis v. GersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Imhoff v. LipeIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Thornton v. BoydenIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Sever v. LyonsIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cochran v. CutlerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
  2. Garwood v. GarwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Franklin v. ComerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  4. Bachman v. HurttWyoming Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Skach v. HeakinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API