Legal Opinion

Easton v. Hall

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1926No. 17302. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dunn

Charles S. Easton, the son and only heir of Sarah D. Easton, filed a bill in the circuit court of Peoria county for the construction of his mother’s will, alleging that various parts of the will were invalid because they were in violation of the rule against perpetuities, and praying that the invalid provisions be decreed to be of no effect and that the fee simple title of all the property of the testatrix affected by them be decreed to be in the complainant, as the sole heir of the testatrix. A decree was entered finding that some of the provisions of the will violated the rule against…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Russell v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Hale v. HaleIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Crerar v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Lightcap v. BradleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Baker v. CopenbargerIllinois Supreme Court · 1853

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Beach v. BeachCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Williams v. CrickmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Corwin v. RheimsIllinois Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Cohen v. SchlossbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1958
  5. Northern Trust Co. v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1929

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API