Legal Opinion
Arkansas Nature Alliance, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
Decided February 14, 2003No. 1-02-CV00037-WRWPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILSON, District Judge.
I. Introduction:
I must determine whether Defendants, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”or “COE”) and its District Director, have failed to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) and its implementing regulations, in the issuance of Letter of Permission (“LOP”) No. 01114-2, and in the issuance of Nationwide Permit (“NWP”) No. 0111401. Implicit in that decision is the question of whether the Corps’ decision on the permit application required either an environmental assessment (EA) or an environmental impact statement (EIS), or whether the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Davis, a Municipal Corporation v. William T. Coleman, Jr., Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Save Our Ten Acres v. Rod Kreger, Acting Administrator, General Services AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. Earl v. Butz, Individually, and as Secretary of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ripplin Shoals Land Company, Llc v. United States Army Corps Of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate of the Lake Traverse Reservation v. United States Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2013
- Ripplin Shoals Land Co. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Ripplin Shoals Land Co. v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006