Southern Railway Co. v. Dantzler
Supreme Court of Georgia
Action for damages. Before Judge Kimsey. Haber■sb'am superior court. ‘September term, 1895.
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
1. What purports to be a copy of the brief of the oral evidence agreed to by counsel and approved by the trial judge appears in the record. Immediately following this are copies of certain documents, but there is nothing in the record which shows that the originals of these copies were introduced in evidence or that any copies of such originals ever constituted parts of the brief of evidence as approved by the judge. This court, therefore, cannot treat as portions of the transcript of the brief of evidence in this case the above mentioned copies of documents, but is confined to the transcript…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. BondSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- Page v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Warnell v. PonderCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Scott v. WimberlySupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.