Legal Opinion

Tay-Tay, Inc. v. Young

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 5, 2002No. 01-1377PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Annabelle Clinton Imber, Justice.

Appellants, Tay-Tay, Inc., Arkansas Payday Check Cashers, Inc, Iwo Cluck, Inc. d/b/a Payday Advance, and Jim Mead (Jointly “Payday Advance”), appeal the Craighead County Circuit Court’s certification of a class of plaintiffs, including appellee class representatives Brandon Young, Jimmie Sue Spencer, and Karla Blackford, in this class-action lawsuit. In a typical transaction, the customer would use the services of Payday Advance by presenting a check to Payday Advance in the amount of $233.33, for which the customer received $200 in cash in return. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Fraley v. Williams Ford Tractor & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  3. Mega Life and Health Ins. Co. v. JacolaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  4. Arthur v. ZearleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. BPS, Inc. v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  2. Beverly Enterprises - Arkansas, Inc. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  3. Lenders Title Co. v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc. v. PalasackSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  5. National Cash, Inc. v. LovelessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API