Legal Opinion

Baltimore Transit Co. v. Brooks

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 7, 1961No. 127PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

The successful plaintiff below was injured as he stepped from a trackless trolley onto an isolated patch of sheet ice on the street between the curb and the trolley, and fell. The owner of the trolley appeals on the ground that the case should not have gone to the jury because “the conflicting and speculative evidence” offered by the plaintiff “failed to disclose any breach of duty on the part of the Defendant to provide the Plaintiff with a reasonably safe place to alight.”

Implicit in the question presented, as the appellant poses it, is that the law is that the operator of a streetcar owes…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Devoto v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Smith v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. Topp v. United Railways & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
  4. Smith v. Northern Central Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  5. Hayes v. United Railways & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leatherwood Motor Coach Tours Corp. v. NathanCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  2. McDougall v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API