State v. Costanzo
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFahrnbruch, J.
Ricky J. Costanzo, now serving a prison term for first degree assault, claims in this appeal that the trial court erred in not granting him (1) a new trial because of newly discovered evidence and (2) postconviction relief on account of (a) ineffectiveness of counsel, (b) the State’s failure to disclose exculpatory evidence, and (c) prosecutor misconduct.
The defendant’s conviction and sentence in the district court for Douglas County were affirmed on direct appeal in State v. Costanzo, 227 Neb. 616, 419 N.W.2d 156 (1988). On this appeal, we affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. ReevesNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CostanzoNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. FrenchNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. DalyNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. WhiteleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. BowenNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. JimNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. JoubertNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. PerezNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CarterNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.