Holt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHATTIN, Justice.
State Farm filed this suit pursuant to our declaratory judgment statute seeking a determination of its liability to a claim of Holt filed against the insureds, if any, under two of its policies. State Farm sought a declaration that it was not liable to Holt nor obligated to defend the claim against the insureds under the terms of either policy.
The Chancellor heard the matter on the bill, answer and a stipulation of facts and found the coverages of the two policies did not extend to or for the benefit of Holt.
Holt has perfected an appeal to this Court and has assigned…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dressler v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1963
- McManus v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by35 opinions
- Harrison v. MFA Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Rodman v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- Dairyland Insurance v. FinchOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Company v. Mary Bakke, Johnny Bakke, Jo Lynn Wood, Karla Vigil and Lawrence VigilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. HanleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.