Legal Opinion · Dissent

Manning v. Manning

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 5, 1976No. 31440Published

1DissentHill, Justice

I dissent for the reason that heretofore, in order for a judgment of divorce to be entered, a trial has been *752required in all cases, Code Ann. §§ 30-101, 30-113, except where both parties wanted a divorce, Friedman v. Friedman, 233 Ga. 254 (210 SE2d 754) (1974) (both parties sought divorce on ground that marriage was irretrievably broken); Marshall v. Marshall, 234 Ga. 393 (216 SE2d 117) (1975) (wife sought divorce on ground of cruel treatment, husband sought divorce on ground of cruel treatment and marriage irretrievably broken); Hodges v. Hodges, 235 Ga. 848 (221 SE2d 597) (1976) (both…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Friedman v. FriedmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  2. Marshall v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  4. Loftis v. LoftisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  5. Googe v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API