Legal Opinion

Chisholm and Dyball v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 30, 1927No. 11452Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant’s motion for new trial was overruled on the 4th day of June, 1927. No order was then made granting extension of time for filing statement of facts and bills of exception beyond the thirty days allowed by law. (Art. 760, C. C. P.) After the expiration of the thirty days an order granting sixty days from adjournment of court was made. It is not necessary to pass upon the effect of this order by reason of its having been made after the thirty days allowed by law had expired. Court adjourned on the 30th day of July. The judgment having been…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Croomes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  2. Stanford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  3. Gowan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Carpenter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Vickers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API