Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Varah

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 28, 1999No. WCB 97-06270; CA A103050Published

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

Petitioners, an employer and its insurer, seek reversal of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board that awarded claimant assessed attorney fees pursuant to ORS 656.386(1)(a) and (c). They contend that the Board erred in concluding that the original notice of acceptance of claimant’s claim was, in fact, a denial and that the insurer’s subsequent modification of that notice constituted a “rescission of the denial.” ORS 656.386(1)(a). We reverse and remand.

In April 1997, claimant, who was employed as a habilitive training technician, suffered a compensable injury while lifting a client.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schoch v. Leupold & StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Stephenson v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. Galbraith v. L.A. Pottsratz ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API