Transwestern Pipeline Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Per curiam
This case comes before the court on defendant’s exceptions to the recommended decision (including an opinion, findings of fact, and conclusions of law) filed by Trial Judge Mastín G. White. After hearing oral *400argument and considering the government’s exceptions and the briefs of the parties, as well as the record as a whole, the court hereby adopts the trial judge’s findings and opinion, as supplemented by the following, as the basis for its judgment in the case.1
The government’s attack on the trial judge’s findings of fact and conclusions of law is based on its contention that the line pack…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Thor Power Tool Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Commissioner v. Idaho Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Southern Natural Gas Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. of New York v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Mapco Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
3Cited by16 opinions
- Arkla, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Washington Energy Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Pacific Enters. & Subsidiaries v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993
- Hewlett-Packard Company and Subsidiaries, Successor to Apollo Computer, Inc., and Subsidiaries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Arkla, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.